4.6 Article

Management of premature ejaculation: a clinical guideline from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 1103-1118

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40618-020-01458-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. PRIN Grant [2017S9KTNE_002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Premature ejaculation (PE) is the most prevalent male sexual dysfunction, with both organic and psychosexological causes. The Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) has proposed 33 recommendations concerning the definition, pathophysiology, treatment and management of PE in order to improve patient care. New therapeutic options, as well as combination and off-label treatments, are also described in the guidelines.
Premature ejaculation (PE) is the most prevalent male sexual dysfunction, and the most recently defined. PE is often mistakenly considered a purely psychosexological symptom by patients: the lacking awareness in regards to the pathophysiology and treatments often lead to resignation from the patients' side, making PE the most underdiagnosed sexual complaint. However, an ever-growing body of evidence supporting several organic factors has been developed in the last decades and several definitions have been suggested to encompass all defining features of PE. In the present document by the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS), we propose 33 recommendations concerning the definition, pathophysiology, treatment and management of PE aimed to improve patient care. These evidence-based clinical guidelines provide the necessary up-to-date guidance in the context of PE secondary to organic and psychosexological conditions, such as prostate inflammation, endocrine disorders, and other sexual dysfunctions, and suggest how to associate pharmacotherapies and cognitive-behavioral therapy in a couple-centered approach. New therapeutic options, as well as combination and off-label treatments, are also described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据