4.2 Article

A simple and economic chromatographic method for simultaneous determination of six bronchodilator drugs in pharmaceutical dosage forms

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE IRANIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 1251-1259

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13738-020-02107-6

关键词

Bronchodilator drugs; Liquid chromatography; Validation; Pharmaceuticals; Eco-scale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully developed a new method to simultaneously determine six bronchodilators, which can save costs, solvents, and chemicals. It is a rapid, sensitive, and highly efficient analytical method.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Combining an inhaled anticholinergic and a beta 2-agonist are a convenient way of delivering treatment, obtaining better lung function and improved symptoms. We aimed to develop and validate a reliable HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of the anticholinergics; ipratropium bromide, glycopyrronium bromide and tiotropium bromide in addition to the beta 2-agonists; bambuterol hydrochloride, formoterol fumarate and indacaterol maleate. The chromatographic separation was achieved on a Phenomenex Luna phenyl-hexyl (250 x 4.6 mm i.d., 5 mu m) column and a mobile phase composed of 0.2% phosphoric acid (pH 3.0)/methanol/acetonitrile (66:12:22, v/v/v). The analysis was performed at a flow rate of 1 mL/min with UV detection at 210 nm. Method validation showed that calibration curves were linear within the range from 0.5 to 30.0 mu g/mL with a correlation coefficient > 0.998. Intraday and interday precision and accuracy evaluated by relative standard deviation were lower than 2%. The limits of detection were in the ranges of 0.037-0.152 mu g/mL. The developed method which is rapid, sensitive and highly efficient was applied for the analysis of the six bronchodilators in single and combined formulations saving money, solvents and chemicals. In addition, the environmental impact of the proposed method was evaluated using a suitable analytical Eco-Scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据