4.5 Review

The state of gene therapy research in Africa, its significance and implications for the future

期刊

GENE THERAPY
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 581-589

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gt.2017.57

关键词

-

资金

  1. South African National Research Foundation (NRF) [81768, 81692, 68339, 85981, 77954, 61508]
  2. South African Medical Research Council
  3. Swiss-South African Joint Research Program
  4. Johnson & Johnson Innovation
  5. South African Poliomyelitis Research Foundation [PRF-15/27]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene therapy has made impressive recent progress and has potential for treating a wide range of diseases, many of which are important to Africa. However, as a result of lack of direct public funding and skilled personnel, direct research on gene therapy in Africa is currently limited and resources to support the endeavor are modest. A strength of the technology is that it is based on principles of rational design, and the tools of gene therapy are now highly versatile. For example gene silencing and gene editing may be used to disable viral genes for therapeutic purposes. Gene therapy may thus lead to cure from infections with HIV-1, hepatitis B virus and Ebola virus, which are of significant public health importance in Africa. Although enthusiasm for gene therapy is justified, significant challenges to implementing the technology remain. These include ensuring efficient delivery of therapeutic nucleic acids to target cells, limiting unintended effects, cost and complexity of treatment regimens. In addition, implementation of effective legislation that will govern gene therapy research will be a challenge. Nevertheless, it is an exciting prospect that gene therapy should soon reach the mainstream of medical management. Participation of African researchers in the exciting developments is currently limited, but their involvement is important to address health problems, develop capacity and enhance economic progress of the continent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据