4.6 Article

A homozygous CEP135 mutation is associated with multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella (MMAF)

期刊

GENE
卷 633, 期 -, 页码 48-53

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.08.033

关键词

Multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella; MMAF; CEP135; Consanguineous family; Whole-exome sequencing; Centriole; In vitro fertilization; Short-tailed

资金

  1. Fujian Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission [2015-2-52, 2016-2-72]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Fujian Province [2015D018, 2016D10, 2017D011]
  3. Xiamen Science and Technology Planning Project [3502Z20154033, 3502Z20154035]
  4. Major/Important Disease Research Project [3502Z20159022]
  5. Young/Middle-aged Talent Cultivation Project [2015-ZQN-JC-44]
  6. Key Laboratory of Male Reproductive and Genetics, National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China [KF201704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella (MMAF) is a rare disease associated with primary infertility; however, similar to 50% of the genetic alterations associated with MMAF remain unclear. Here, we reported the case of a 30-year-old infertile male from a consanguineous family. Whole-exome sequencing identified a homozygous mutation in the CEP135 gene (c.A1364T:p.D455V), with CEPI35 previously reported to play a role in centriole biogenesis and specifically central pair assembly. D455V-mutated proteins formed protein aggregates in the centrosome and the flagella, which might potentially affect the function of centriole assembly. Moreover, intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed using sperm from this patient; however, pregnancy failed following embryo transfer. This represents the first report of a homozygous mutation of CEPI35 associated with MMAF. These results provide researchers and clinicians with a deeper understanding of the gene involved with MMAF and will help predict and assess pregnancy outcomes associated with in vitro fertilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据