4.7 Article

Humidity-dependence of the hydroxyl accessibility in Norway spruce wood

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 45-58

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-020-03535-6

关键词

Deuterium exchange; DVS; FT-IR spectroscopy; Sorption; Wood

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to understand the role of hydroxyl accessibility in wood-water interaction during humidity-dependent changes in moisture content. The results showed that changes in hydroxyl accessibility were not the driving force for these changes, although a slow re-protonation rate at low relative humidity was observed.
This study aimed at a better understanding of the wood-water interaction, in particular the role of the hydroxyl accessibility during the humidity-dependent change in moisture content. Thin sections (80 mu m) of never-dried Norway spruce sapwood that contained early- and latewood were used for the experiments. Sorption isotherm measurements confirmed the humidity-dependent moisture content changes and the effect of the first drying of the wood sections. Changes in hydroxyl accessibility were then determined by deuteration of the sections using deuterium oxide, followed by their re-protonation in water (H2O) vapor at different relative humidity: 15, 55 or 95%. The deuteration and re-protonation of the wood sections were quantified by dry mass changes as well as by changes in the OH and OD stretching vibrations in the Fourier transform infrared spectra. The results showed that the deuterated sections could be almost completely re-protonated in H2O vapor, nearly irrespective of the applied relative humidity. Therefore, changes in hydroxyl accessibility were not the driving force for the humidity-dependent changes in moisture content. However, a slow re-protonation rate at low relative humidity had to be considered. Nonetheless, a small quantity of OD groups persisted the re-protonation in H2O vapor and liquid H2O, which was not related to the drying of the wood. Graphic abstract

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据