4.2 Article

A story of nimble knowledge production in an era of academic capitalism

期刊

THEORY AND SOCIETY
卷 50, 期 4, 页码 541-575

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11186-020-09422-0

关键词

Academic capitalism; Artificial intelligence; Epistemic form; Knowledge production; Problem choice; Research policy

资金

  1. MacArthur Foundation
  2. Mellon Foundation
  3. Kaplan Center for the Humanities
  4. Department of Sociology at Northwestern University
  5. Humanities Institute
  6. Office of the Vice President for Research at the University at Buffalo, SUNY

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores the rise of academic capitalism in research-intensive universities and how scientists manage uncertainties in research practice and problem choice under commercial funding streams. Through a detailed case study, it identifies three lab-level features of scientists' strategies and theorizes a nimble knowledge production approach.
A rise of academic capitalism over the past four decades has been well documented within many research-intensive universities. Largely missing, however, are in-depth studies of how particularly situated academic groups manage the uncertainties that come with intermittent and fickle commercial funding streams in their daily research practice and problem choice. To capture the strategies scientists adopt under these conditions, this article provides an ethnographically detailed (and true) story about how a single project in Artificial Intelligence grew over several years from a peripheral idea to the very center of an academic lab's commercial portfolio. The analysis theorizes an epistemic form-nimble knowledge production-and documents three of its lab-level features: 1) rapid prototyping to keep sunk costs low, 2) shared search for real world problems rather than theoretical ones, and 3) nimble commitment to research problem choice. While similar forms of academic knowledge transfer have been lauded as mode 2, innovative, or hybrid for initiating cross-institutional collaboration and pushing science beyond disciplinary silos, this case suggests it can rely on fleeting attention to problems resistant to a quick fix.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据