4.5 Article

Saving energy while maintaining the feeling of safety associated with urban street lighting

期刊

CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 251-269

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-020-01974-0

关键词

Street lighting (SL); Feeling of safety (FoS); Energy efficiency; Urban environment

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [400/18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using warmer lights and increasing light uniformity, energy savings of 30-50% can be achieved on street lighting. For medium-size cities with 200-400 K residents, energy savings on street lighting can reach 8-23 MWh per annum, equivalent to a small-to-medium-size power plant output. This study demonstrates that energy can be saved on street lighting while maintaining a reasonable level of safety.
Street lighting (SL) forms a major share of municipal energy consumption and should thus be energy efficient. However, question of how much energy can be saved on SL without compromising on the feeling of safety (FoS), which SL helps to provide for pedestrians, poses a major challenge. To tackle this challenge, in this study, we attempt to determine the amount of energy that can potentially be saved by a proper selection of SL attributes, such as light color and uniformity, while preserving FoS by pedestrians. As the study indicates, using warmer lights and increasing light uniformity can result in 30-50% energy savings on SL. Using this assessment, we estimate that for medium-size cities with population of 200-400 K residents, energy savings on SL can reach 8-23 MWh per annum, which is equal to the output of a small-to-medium-size power plant. As we conclude, the study findings help to design more efficient SL systems that can promote urban residents' well-being, while saving energy and contributing to a cleaner and more sustainable urban environment. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first that shows that energy on SL can be saved by using warmer lights and increasing light uniformity, while preserving a reasonable level of FoS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据