4.4 Article

A tale of three seasons: a cultural sport psychology and gender performativity approach to practitioner identity and development in professional football

期刊

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2020.1833967

关键词

Gender performativity; Cultural Sport Psychology; Identity; Professional Development; Longitudinal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored how the organisational and cultural experiences of a trainee Sport Psychology Consultant working in professional football shaped her identity and professional development. It found that the identity development of SPCs is a challenging process defined by a series of culturally specific critical moments. Contextual intelligence and cultural proficiency are crucial for a trainee SPC's survival in elite and professional sport environments.
The present study explored how the organisational and cultural experiences of a trainee Sport Psychology Consultant (SPC) working in professional football shaped her identity and professional development. Drawing on Cultural Sport Psychology (CSP) and gender performativity as guiding frameworks, we explored the first author's identity development as a sport psychology practitioner-researcher within one professional football club over a 3-year duration. Traditional ethnographic data collection methods were employed, including, field notes and a reflective journal. Through creative non-fiction vignettes, we show that the traditional masculine discourse in professional football shaped the first author's sense of self and subsequent behaviours. From the results of this study, we suggest that SPCs identity development is not smooth or linear, rather it can be described as a 'rocky road to individuation' defined by a series of culturally specific 'critical moments'. We strongly believe that contextual intelligence and cultural proficiency are essential for a trainee SPCs survival during early and later career stages of working within elite and professional sport environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据