4.4 Article

Enhancement of antibacterial activity of synthesized ligand-free CdS nanocrystals due to silver doping

期刊

JOURNAL OF BASIC MICROBIOLOGY
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 27-36

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jobm.202000296

关键词

Ag; CdS nanocrystals; antimicrobial activity; ligand free; TEM; zone of inhibition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study synthesized CdS and Ag-doped CdS nanocrystals and tested their antimicrobial activity on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. The results show that both nanocrystals are ineffective against E. coli but effective against S. aureus, with Ag-doped CdS showing more significant inhibition effects than CdS.
Recently, different nanocrystals have been reported to be the alternative, optimistic, and novel antimicrobial agent against the many antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Here, ligand-free CdS and Ag-doped CdS (Ag/CdS) nanocrystals have been synthesized by chemical methods for the study of the antimicrobial activity on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by Kirby-Bauer diffusion method to see the effect against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. These prepared nanocrystals have been characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). TEM and SEM images confirm the spherical morphology of both the sample and the respective XRD patterns indicate polycrystalline nature having a cubic zinc blende structure. Antibacterial activities have been tested with CdS and Ag/CdS, considering concentrations ranging from 10 to 200 mu g/ml. After 24 h of incubation, the zone of inhibition (ZOI) is measured for each concentration, which shows that both the nanocrystals are ineffective against E. coli but much effective against S. aureus at this low concentration range. Furthermore, Ag/CdS nanocrystals have been found to show much more ZOI than CdS. Differences in the antibacterial activity can be due to the presence of different cell wall in E. coli and S. aureus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据