4.7 Article

Combustion characteristics and typical pollutant emissions of corn stalk blending with municipal sewage sludge

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 9792-9805

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11463-y

关键词

Corn stalk; Municipal sewage sludge; Co-combustion; Thermogravimetric analysis; Pollutant emissions

资金

  1. thirteenth five-year science and technology research project of the education department of Jilin province, China [JJKH20190702KJ]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combustion characteristics of the mixture are affected by the mix ratio of SS, with lower SO2 emission amount and S-SO2 conversion rate compared to CS. Despite higher SO2 and NO emissions from CS blending with SS, the conversion rate of SO2 and NO decreases.
The co-combustion of sewage sludge and biomass is a key problem in coal-fired power plants. The combustion characteristics and pollutant emissions of municipal sewage sludge and biomass could result in unpredictable operation and environmental problems. In this study, the combustion experiments of corn stalk (CS), municipal sewage sludge (SS), and their blends were conducted in the thermogravimetric analyzer and muffle furnace, focusing on the combustion characteristics and the pollutants (SO2/NO) emissions with different temperature, proportion, and heating rate. It was found that the combustion characteristics of the mixture are affected by the mix ratio of SS. Compared with those of SS, the SO2 emission amount and S-SO2 conversion rate of CS are lower. The content of N in SS is higher than CS, but the conversion rate of N-NO is lower. Although the emissions of SO2 and NO from CS blending with SS are higher than those from CS combustion alone, the conversion rate of SO2 and NO decreases. This means that the co-combustion of CS and SS will reduce the content of pollutants released by CS combustion alone and effectively solve the environmental problems associated with CS incineration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据