相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Comparison of latency and efficacy of twin mix and modified twin mix in impacted mandibular third molar surgery - A Preliminary Randomized Triple Blind Split Mouth Clinical Study
S. Beena et al.
JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2020)
Cryotherapy in reducing pain, trismus, and facial swelling after third-molar surgery Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Edmundo Marques do Nascimento-Junior et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (2019)
Is 0.75% ropivacaine more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for IANB in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar?
K. Varun Reddy et al.
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG (2019)
Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction
Maria Victoria Olmedo-Gaya et al.
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS (2018)
Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis
Romina Brignardello-Petersen et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
Applying GRADE to a network meta-analysis of antidepressants led to more conservative conclusions
Ashley Bonner et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
Pre-emptive ice cube cryotherapy for reducing pain from local anaesthetic injections for simple lacerations: a randomised controlled trial
JaeWoo Song et al.
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL (2018)
Is amalgamated ligno-bupivacaine an answer to complicated minor oral surgical anesthesia? A randomized split-mouth double-blind clinical trial
Akshay Mishra et al.
ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG (2018)
Efficacy and safety of 1% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after lower third molar surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study
Bozidar Brkovic et al.
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS (2017)
A Comparative Study Between Bupivacaine with Adrenaline and Carbonated Bupivacaine with Adrenaline for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar
M. Shyamala et al.
JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY (2016)
The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
Brian Hutton et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2015)
Ropivacaine: a new local anaesthetic agent in maxillofacial surgery
A. Budharapu et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2015)
The Effectiveness of Ropivacaine and Mepivacaine in the Postoperative Pain after Third Lower Molar Surgery
Vito Crincoli et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (2015)
Efficacy and Safety of 2% and 4% Articaine for Lower Third Molar Surgery
A. M. Senes et al.
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH (2015)
Levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine for third molar surgery: quality of anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia and local vascular effects
Denis Brajkovic et al.
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS (2014)
A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis
Milo A. Puhan et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)
Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5 and 0.75 % Ropivacaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
Darpan Bhargava et al.
JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY (2014)
Efficiency of Bupivacaine Versus Lidocaine and Methylprednisolone Versus Placebo to Reduce Postoperative Pain and Swelling After Surgical Removal of Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Clinical Trial
Jennifer Christensen et al.
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2013)
Clinical study of hemodynamic changes comparing 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine
Hecio Henrique Araujo de Morais et al.
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY (2013)
Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study
Deepashri H. Kambalimath et al.
JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY (2013)
Bupivacaine 0.5% versus articaine 4% for the removal of lower third molars. A crossover randomized controlled trial
Manuel Sancho-Puchades et al.
MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL (2012)
Evaluation of the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of 1:100,000 articaine versus 1:100,000 lidocaine. A comparative study in surgery of the lower third molar
Natalia Martinez-Rodriguez et al.
MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL (2012)
Articaine versus lidocaine for third molar surgery: A randomized clinical study
Luiz-Carlos-F. Silva et al.
MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL (2012)
Efficacy of lignocaine with clonidine and adrenaline in minor oral surgical procedure
Shouvik Chowdhury et al.
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY (2012)
Comparative study of two local anesthetics in the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: Bupivacaine and articaine
Anna Trullenque-Eriksson et al.
MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL (2011)
A Randomized Controlled Trail Comparing the Efficacy of 0.5% Centbucridine to 2% Lignocaine as Local Anesthetics in Dental Extractions
Samir Mansuri et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2011)
Independent predictors of satisfaction in impacted third molar surgery patients
YuKyoung Kim et al.
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
An update on pain
T. Renton
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL (2008)
Central sensitization phenomena after third molar surgery: A quantitative sensory testing study
Gitte I. Juhl et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN (2008)
A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal
Leonardo V. L. Gregorio et al.
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY (2008)
Epinephrine concentration (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% Articaine for lower third molar removal:: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study
Carlos E. Santos et al.
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2007)
Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions
Lucia Lago-Mendez et al.
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2007)
Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal:: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study
Bella L. Colombini et al.
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY (2006)
Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different?
Andrea Casati et al.
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY (2005)
Comparison of clonidine and epinephrine in lidocaine anaesthesia for lower third molar surgery
B Brkovic et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2005)
Pain and analgesic response after third molar extraction and other postsurgical pain
J Barden et al.
PAIN (2004)
Safety and efficacy of levobupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after the surgical removal of impacted third molars: a comparison with lignocaine and adrenaline
JP Rood et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2002)
Ropivacaine for dental anesthesia: A dose-finding study
M Ernberg et al.
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY (2002)
Neuroscience - Neuronal plasticity: Increasing the gain in pain
CJ Woolf et al.
SCIENCE (2000)