4.6 Article

Stepped enhancement of CO2 adsorption and separation in IL-ZIF-IL composites with shell-interlayer-core structure

期刊

AICHE JOURNAL
卷 67, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17112

关键词

CO2 capture; composites; ionic liquids; separation; zeolitic imidazolate framework

资金

  1. National Key Projects for Fundamental Research and Development of China [2016YFB0600901]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21722602, 21978005, 21878229]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a novel strategy to enhance gas separation performance in micro/nano-materials by constructing a shell-interlayer-core structure. The composite with outer [TETA]L shell, ZIF-8 interlayer, and inner [TETA]L core shows more evident molecular sieving separation for CO2 mixtures compared to reported materials. The separation performance can be controlled by adjusting the structure and thickness of the shell.
Development of materials with excellent separation performance remains an ongoing challenge in separation science and technology. Herein, a novel strategy was proposed to gradually enhance gas separation performance in micro/nano-materials, by constructing a shell-interlayer-core structure using ionic liquid (triethylenetetramine lactate, [TETA]L) and zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8). Such structure includes outer [TETA]L shell, interlayer of ZIF-8, and inner [TETA]L core, endowing the composite with more evident molecular sieving separation for CO2 mixtures than the reported materials. A high CO2 adsorption amount (1.53 mmol/g at 298 K and 1.0 bar) is maintained, while the uptakes for CH4 and N-2 are very low. Corresponding ideal adsorbed solution theory selectivities are 260-1,990 and 1,688-5,572 for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N-2 mixtures at the range of tested pressures. In addition, the separation performance can be controlled by varying the shell-interlayer-core structure with IL inside, outside or on both sides of ZIF-8 and the thickness of outer shell.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据