4.6 Article

Coupled nonlinear-damage finite element analysis and design of novel engineered wood products made of oak hardwood

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-020-01617-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) via Interreg NWE grant [348]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a comprehensive investigation on novel engineered wood products (EWPs) through experimental and numerical methods, including adhesive-free laminated beams and adhesive-free cross-laminated timber panels. Using thermo-mechanically compressed wood dowels as joint elements, a predictive coupled nonlinear-damage model was proposed. Experimental results validated the accuracy and performance of the developed finite element model.
This paper presents a comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation to design novel engineered wood products (EWPs), namely adhesive-free laminated beams (AFLB) and adhesive-free cross-laminated timber (AFCLT) panels, for the first time. Thermo-mechanically compressed wood (CW) dowels were used as a joint element as an alternative to the traditional glue and metallic fasteners. The following structural elements were studied: (1) solid timber beams, (2) middle-scale and large-scale three-layer AFLB, (3) timber-to-timber connections and (4) AFCLT panels. In addition, a predictive coupled nonlinear-damage model was proposed as a predictive and powerful tool design to reduce expensive experimental tests. The main mechanical characteristics and performance of the designed EWPs are assessed experimentally and addressed in the paper. Furthermore, the accuracy and the performance of the developed FE model were verified against experimental results from the studied example showing a fairly good prediction of the non-linear behavior as well as the modes of failure and its growth. Finally, the validated FE model was used to carry out a parametric study of the influential design parameters and some design recommendations are made.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据