4.7 Article

Unraveling the Roles of Hot Electrons and Cocatalyst toward Broad Spectrum Photocatalytic H2 Generation of g-C3N4 Nanotube

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.202000504

关键词

cocatalysts; hot electrons; photocatalytic H-2 generation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672113, 21975110, 21972058]
  2. Taishan Youth Scholar Program of Shandong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a promising ternary photocatalyst by integrating Au and CoO nanoparticles with g-C3N4 nanotubes, showing enhanced photocatalytic activity and wide-light spectrum response under plasmonic-assisted conditions.
Exploiting active photocatalysts with broad spectrum light response is a priority target in the field of photocatalysis. Herein, integrating Au and CoO nanoparticles with g-C3N4 hollow nanotubes, a promising ternary photocatalyst with wide-light spectrum response (420-650 nm) is designed, in which Au nanoparticles play the dual role of plasmonic electron donor and reduction cocatalyst, while CoO nanoparticles act as oxidation cocatalyst. The optimum H-2 evolution rates of the ternary hybrid reach 238.7 and 4.9 mu mol under the irradiation of visible light and monochromic light of 650 nm, respectively. Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) can promote charge-carrier generation in the g-C3N4, and the appropriate band alignment between the Au and g-C3N4 is favorable for hot electron transfer from Au to g-C3N4, which makes this ternary hybrid possess extra hot electrons for water reduction reaction under a wider solar spectrum. Furthermore, Au as a reduction cocatalyst and CoO as an oxidation cocatalyst can effectively impel the charge separation and restrain charge recombination, which is also responsible for the enhanced photocatalytic activity. This work affords a credible strategy for the rational construction of plasmon-assisted photocatalysts for the wider-spectrum appliance of solar energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据