4.6 Article

Deep-red emitting Mg2TiO4:Mn4+ phosphor ceramics for plant lighting

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED CERAMICS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 88-97

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40145-020-0421-6

关键词

solid state reaction; optical properties; thermal conductivity; ceramic phosphor

资金

  1. Shanghai Pujiang Program [18PJ1408800]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Program [19511104600]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB1102303]
  4. International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [181231KYSB20160005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep-red emitting Mg2TiO4:Mn4+ phosphor ceramics were synthesized and showed narrow emission suitable for photosynthesis. The ceramics had a high thermal conductivity compared to traditional packaging methods and when combined with blue LED chips, the color and brightness of the resulting LEDs could be adjusted for plant lighting.
In this study, deep-red emitting Mg2TiO4:Mn4+ phosphor ceramics were synthesized by the high temperature solid-state reaction method. The ceramics can be excited by the 465 nm blue light and had a narrow emission with a full width at half maximum (FWMH) value of 31 nm. The peak wavelength was located at 658 nm, which matched the demanded wavelength for photosynthesis. The crystal field strength (D-q) and the Racah parameters (B and C) were estimated by the Tanabe-Sugano diagram. The thermal conductivity of the Mg2Ti((0.999))O-4:0.001Mn(4+) ceramic was 7.535 W/(m center dot K) at room temperature, which was one order of magnitude higher than that of the traditional packaging method using the silicone gel. A set of phosphor converted LEDs were fabricated by mounting the phosphor ceramics onto the 460 nm blue LED chips and the CIE coordinates can move from the blue region to the purple light region with the thickness of the ceramic increasing. These results indicated that the Mg2TiO4:Mn4+ phosphor ceramic was suitable for plant lighting when combined with a blue LED chip.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据