Correction of iron deficiency in hospitalized heart failure patients does not improve patient outcomes

Heart failure (HF) has an estimated prevalence of 1-2% in the world's population and up to 10% of patients age 65 and above. Iron deficiency (ID) in HF has been shown to be an independent contributor of increased mortality and poorer quality of life and has been associated with increased rates of hospitalization. Estimates are varied, but it is believed that as many as 30-83% of HF patients have ID, often without overt anemia, therefore making diagnosis more difficult. Well-established large studies have shown intravenous iron (IVFe) supplementation in HF patients is superior to an oral route, though these guidelines were developed for the chronic HF patients in the outpatient setting. For patients who are frequently hospitalized for HF, their inpatient stays may present an opportunity to diagnose ID. We previously showed that ID is underdiagnosed in the inpatient setting. To date, limited studies investigate long-term outcomes in hospitalized HF patients diagnosed with ID who are treated with IVFe compared to those who are not. In this retrospective analysis, we assessed 1-year readmission rates and mortality outcomes in patients who were diagnosed with ID while admitted for HF and subsequently received IVFe versus those who did not on their initial admission. These data suggest that there is no significant reduction in readmissions for HF or mortality between those patients who received IVFe and those who did not.

Automated summary

Iron deficiency in heart failure patients is associated with increased mortality, but diagnosing it can be challenging. While intravenous iron supplementation has been shown to be superior, diagnosing ID in hospitalized patients remains a challenge. Our study found no significant difference in readmission rates or mortality between HF patients who received IVFe treatment and those who did not.