4.6 Review

Genetic testing in dementia - utility and clinical strategies

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 23-36

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-00416-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leonard Wolfson Foundation
  2. University of London Chadburn Academic Clinical Lectureship
  3. Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist Fellowship [MR/M008525/1]
  4. NIHR Rare Disease Translational Research Collaboration [BRC149/NS/MH]
  5. National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
  6. Wolfson Foundation
  7. ARUK [ARUK-PG2017-1946]
  8. Brain Research UK [UCC14191]
  9. Weston Brain Institute [UB170045]
  10. Medical Research Council
  11. British Heart Foundation
  12. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [666992]
  13. UK Dementia Research Institute
  14. Rosetrees Trust
  15. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  16. Medical Research Council (UK)
  17. Wellcome Trust
  18. Takeda Pharmaceuticals
  19. Cantervale Limited
  20. NIHR North Thames Local Clinical Research Network
  21. Wolfson Foundation for Neurodegeneration
  22. CHDI Foundation
  23. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at University College Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  24. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_00024/1, MC_U123160651] Funding Source: researchfish
  25. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0617-10175] Funding Source: researchfish
  26. MRC [UKDRI-1008/2, MC_UU_00024/1, UKDRI-1001, MC_U123160651] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical genetic testing for dementia disorders has advanced rapidly, offering precise molecular diagnosis and options for affected families, but the complexity of the conditions requires careful consideration of appropriate testing methods based on clinical condition, family history, and age at onset.
Techniques for clinical genetic testing in dementia disorders have advanced rapidly but remain to be more widely implemented in practice. A positive genetic test offers a precise molecular diagnosis, can help members of an affected family to determine personal risk, provides a basis for reproductive choices and can offer options for clinical trials. The likelihood of identifying a specific genetic cause of dementia depends on the clinical condition, the age at onset and family history. Attempts to match phenotypes to single genes are mostly inadvisable owing to clinical overlap between the dementias, genetic heterogeneity, pleiotropy and concurrent mutations. Currently, the appropriate genetic test in most cases of dementia is a next-generation sequencing gene panel, though some conditions necessitate specific types of test such as repeat expansion testing. Whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing are becoming financially feasible but raise or exacerbate complex issues such as variants of uncertain significance, secondary findings and the potential for re-analysis in light of new information. However, the capacity for data analysis and counselling is already restricting the provision of genetic testing. Patients and their relatives need to be given reliable information to enable them to make informed choices about tests, treatments and data sharing; the ability of patients with dementia to make decisions must be considered when providing this information. In this Review, the authors discuss how technological advances are enabling clinical genetic testing for various dementia disorders. Additionally, they consider which types of test are appropriate for which patients and address the ethical issues that can be raised by genetic testing in these disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据