4.4 Article

Comparative RNA-Seq analysis of the root revealed transcriptional regulation system for aluminum tolerance in contrasting indica rice of North East India

期刊

PROTOPLASMA
卷 258, 期 3, 页码 517-528

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00709-020-01581-2

关键词

RNA-Seq; Rice; Aluminum toxicity; Co-expression; SNPs enrichment; Differentially expressed gene

资金

  1. Science Education and Research Board (SERB) [PDF/2018/003216]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expression pattern of aluminum tolerance genes plays a crucial role in determining aluminum avoidance/tolerance in plant cultivars. Transcriptome analysis of contrasting indica rice cultivars in India's North Eastern region revealed transcriptional variations associated with aluminum avoidance/tolerance and identified several candidate genes responsible for aluminum tolerance. The study suggests the involvement of both trans-acting and cis-acting polymorphisms in aluminum signaling in the aluminum-tolerant cultivar.
Expression pattern of aluminum (Al) tolerance genes is one of the major determinants of Al avoidance/tolerance within plant cultivars. We have performed transcriptome analysis of two contrasting (Al-tolerant, Disang; Al-sensitive, Joymati) cultivars of India's North Eastern region, an indica rice diversity hotspot, on exposure to excess Al3+ treatment in acidic condition. Co-expression analysis and SNPs enrichment analysis proposed the role of both trans-acting and cis-acting polymorphisms in Al signaling in the Al-tolerant cultivar. We proposed ten major genes, including arginine decarboxylase, phytase, and beta-glucosidase aggregating factor as candidates responsible for Al tolerance based on transcriptome analysis. Al3+ stress led to changes in the alternative splicing profile of the Al-tolerant cultivar. These studies demonstrated the transcriptional variations affiliated to Al avoidance/tolerance in contrasting indica rice of North East India and provided us with several candidate genes responsible for Al tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据