4.6 Article

Enhanced micro/nano-tribological performance in partially crystallized 60NiTi film

期刊

FRICTION
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 1635-1647

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40544-020-0451-7

关键词

60NiTi film; partial crystallization; micro; nano-friction; hardness; ratio of hardness to elastic modulus

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [xzy022019015]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675409]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The partially crystallized 60NiTi film shows the best tribological performance at the micro/nano-scale, with the lowest penetration depth and residual depth.
The microstructure, mechanical and micro/nano-tribological properties of the 60NiTi film annealed at different temperature were investigated. The results reveal that annealing as-deposited 60NiTi film at 300, 375, and 600 degrees C for 1 h leads to structural relaxation, partial crystallization and full crystallization, respectively. Compared with the structurally relaxed structure, the partially crystallized structure exhibits increased hardness but decreased elastic modulus. This is because that the elastic modulus is reduced by Voigt model while the hardness is improved by composite effect. Due to the highest hardness and ratio of hardness to elastic modulus (H/E), the partially crystallized 60NiTi film has the lowest penetration depth and residual depth (i.e., groove depth). Besides, the results also reveal that ductile plowing is the dominant wear mechanism for all the annealed 60NiTi films. Under the condition of the ductile plowing, coefficient of friction and wear resistance are related to penetration depth and residual depth, respectively. Therefore, the partially crystallized 60NiTi film shows the best tribological performance at the micro/nano-scale. The current work not only highlights the important roles of hardness and H/E in improving the micro/nano-tribological properties but also concludes an efficient and simple method for simultaneously increasing hardness and H/E.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据