4.6 Article

In vitro effects of photobiomodulation therapy on 50B11 sensory neurons: evaluation of cell metabolism, oxidative stress, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and capsaicin-induced calcium flow

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202000347

关键词

capsaicin‐ induced calcium flow; mitochondria; nociception; photobiomodulation; sensory neurons; TRPV1

资金

  1. Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo/Italian Ministry of Health [RC02/20, RC15/17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that PBMT at 800 and 970 nm wavelengths has a positive effect on nociceptive sensory neuronal cell line by reducing capsaicin-induced calcium flow, increasing ATP, and MMP hyperpolarization. Additionally, the 800 nm wavelength also increased ROS and O-2(-) levels.
The analgesic properties of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) have been raising increasing interest in the clinical community due to the positive effects observed on patients, nevertheless the mechanistic basis of its action on peripheral sensory neurons remains still elusive. In this study, the effect of near-infrared (NIR) PBMT at 800 and 970 nm of wavelength was investigated on the 50B11 immortalized nociceptive sensory neuronal cell line by evaluating capsaicin-induced calcium flow and different markers correlated to mitochondria, that is, ATP, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP). Calcium peak stimulated by capsaicin, the ligand of TRPV1 channel, was decreased in neurons pre-irradiated with the combination of the two wavelengths. Furthermore, delivering the 800 and 970 nm separately an increment of ATP, as well as MMP hyperpolarization were detected; notably, the 800 nm wavelength also increased ROS and O-2(-) levels. Our findings, obtained on an in vitro model of nociception, show the positive effect of PBMT on two potential photo-targets of NIR light, namely the TRPV1 channel and the mitochondria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据