4.7 Article

Assessing and improving the accuracy of synthetic turbulence generation

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 906, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.859

关键词

turbulence simulation; turbulent boundary layers

资金

  1. National Science Foundation, Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental and Transport Systems grant [CBET-1710670]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Transformational Tools and Technologies grant [80NSSC18M0147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the issues with synthetic turbulence generation methods in matching Reynolds stress profiles and proposes a solution. By decomposing the error into steady-state bias and purely unsteady part, guidance is provided for improving agreement with the target.
With the growing interest in scale-resolving simulations of spatially evolving boundary layers, synthetic turbulence generation (STG) has become a valuable tool for providing unsteady turbulent boundary conditions through a sum over a finite number of spatio-temporal Fourier modes with amplitude, direction and phase determined by a random number set. Recent developments of STG methods are designed to match target profiles for anisotropic and inhomogeneous Reynolds stresses. In this paper, it is shown that, for practical values of the number of modes, a given set of random numbers may produce Reynolds stress profiles that are 30 % off their target. To remedy this situation, the error in the STG stress prediction is decomposed into a steady-state bias and a purely unsteady part affecting the time convergence. Direct relationships between the random number vectors and both types of error are developed, allowing large collections of random number sets to be rapidly scanned and the best performers selected for a much improved agreement with the target. The process is verified for the inflow to a direct numerical simulation of a flat plate at . This paper demonstrates sufficient time convergence over a few flow-through times as well as a correction of the method's biases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据