期刊
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103216
关键词
Teacher judgment accuracy; Foreign language writing; Automated essay scoring
资金
- Swiss National Science Foundation [165483, 100019L162675]
- German Research Foundation (DFG) [Mo648/25-1, KO1513/12-1]
Teacher judgment accuracy (TJA) is essential for diagnostic competence, but research has shown that experienced teachers tend to be more critical in their assessments compared to student teachers and experts. This difference remains even when content knowledge is controlled for, indicating a potential blind spot among experts.
Teacher judgment accuracy (TJA) is a central part of diagnostic competence. Research has revealed heterogeneous results regarding teacher characteristics as determinants of TJA. In the present experi-mental study N = 36 experienced and N = 47 student teachers holistically and analytically assessed four student essays. We compared the judgments of teachers and student teachers to machine scores and expert ratings. Experienced teachers' judgments were more negative than student teachers', and both judgments were more negative than those made by experts, and the machine. The results remained stable, even after controlling for content knowledge. They are discussed in relation to the assumption of an expert-blind-spot. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据