4.6 Article

AIRec: Attentive intersection model for tag-aware recommendation

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 421, 期 -, 页码 105-114

出版社

ELSEVIER

关键词

Tag-aware collaborative filtering; Neural networks; Attention mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIRec is an attentive intersection model for TRS that constructs user representations through multi-layer perceptron and hierarchical attention network, enhances learning by exploiting intersection between user and item tags, and significantly improves tag-aware top-n recommendation.
Tag-aware recommender systems (TRS) utilize rich tagging information to better depict user portraits and item features. Recently, many efforts have been done to improve TRS with neural networks. However, existing methods construct user representations through either explicit tagging behaviors or implicit interacted items, which is inadequate to capture multi-aspect user preferences. Besides, there are still lacks of investigation about the intersection between user and item tags, which is crucial for bet ter recommendation. In this paper, we propose AIRec, an attentive intersection model for TRS, to address the above issues. More precisely, we first project the sparse tag vectors into a latent space through multi-layer perceptron (MLP). Then, the user representations are constructed with a hierarchical attention network, where the item-level attention differentiates the contributions of interacted items and the preference-level attention discriminates the saliencies between explicit and implicit preferences. After that, the intersection between user and item tags is exploited to enhance the learning of conjunct features. Finally, the user and item representations are concatenated and fed to factorization machines (FM) for score prediction. We conduct extensive experiments on two real-world datasets, demonstrating significant improvements of AIRec over state-of-the-art methods for tag-aware top-n recommendation. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据