4.5 Review

Guidelines for Opioid Prescribing in Children and Adolescents After Surgery An Expert Panel Opinion

期刊

JAMA SURGERY
卷 156, 期 1, 页码 76-90

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5045

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed the first opioid-prescribing guidelines for children who require surgery, highlighting key points such as the need for healthcare workers to recognize the risks of opioids, optimize non-opioid pain management, and educate patients and families before and after surgery.
Importance Opioids are frequently prescribed to children and adolescents after surgery. Prescription opioid misuse is associated with high-risk behavior in youth. Evidence-based guidelines for opioid prescribing practices in children are lacking. Objective To assemble a multidisciplinary team of health care experts and leaders in opioid stewardship, review current literature regarding opioid use and risks unique to pediatric populations, and develop a broad framework for evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines for children who require surgery. Evidence Review Reviews of relevant literature were performed including all English-language articles published from January 1, 1988, to February 28, 2019, found via searches of the PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Pediatric was defined as children younger than 18 years. Animal and experimental studies, case reports, review articles, and editorials were excluded. Selected articles were graded using tools from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine 2011 levels of evidence. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was applied throughout guideline creation. Consensus was determined using a modified Delphi technique. Findings Overall, 14 574 articles were screened for inclusion, with 217 unique articles included for qualitative synthesis. Twenty guideline statements were generated from a 2-day in-person meeting and subsequently reviewed, edited, and endorsed externally by pediatric surgical specialists, the American Pediatric Surgery Association Board of Governors, the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Surgery Executive Committee, and the American College of Surgeons Board of Regents. Review of the literature and guideline statements underscored 3 primary themes: (1) health care professionals caring for children who require surgery must recognize the risks of opioid misuse associated with prescription opioids, (2) nonopioid analgesic use should be optimized in the perioperative period, and (3) patient and family education regarding perioperative pain management and safe opioid use practices must occur both before and after surgery. Conclusions and Relevance These are the first opioid-prescribing guidelines to address the unique needs of children who require surgery. Health care professionals caring for children and adolescents in the perioperative period should optimize pain management and minimize risks associated with opioid use by engaging patients and families in opioid stewardship efforts. Question What are the risks of opioid misuse in children and adolescents, what nonopioid regimens effectively manage pain in children after surgery, and what education on opioid use should be provided to families? Findings In this expert panel review and opinion, opioid misuse was found to occur frequently, particularly for adolescents with access to opioids, and nonopioid regimens were found to be effective to minimize or eliminate need for opioids after surgery. Families of children who undergo surgery want instruction on pain management before and after surgery. Meaning Health care workers caring for children after surgery should recognize the risks of opioids, maximize nonopioid regimens, and educate families appropriately. This systematic review summarizes a literature review and consensus process among a multidisciplinary team of health care experts and leaders to generate evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines for children who require surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据