4.7 Article

EUS-guided pancreatic drainage for pancreatic strictures after failed ERCP: a multicenter international collaborative study

期刊

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
卷 85, 期 1, 页码 164-169

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.030

关键词

-

资金

  1. Boston Scientific
  2. Fuji
  3. Pentax
  4. MI Tech
  5. EMcision
  6. ASPIRE Bariatrics
  7. GI Dynamics
  8. W.L. Gore Associates
  9. Cook Endoscopy
  10. Apollo Endosurgery
  11. MaunaKea Tech
  12. NinePoint Medical
  13. Concordia Lab
  14. Merit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims: Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) is considered first-line therapy for management of symptomatic pancreatic duct obstruction. Technical failure with ERP occurs when the main pancreatic duct cannot be cannulated. EUS-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct is a minimally invasive alternative to surgery for failed conventional ERP. We present an international, multicenter study on the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided pancreatic drainage (EUS-PD) for patients who fail conventional endoscopic therapy. Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2015, 80 patients underwent EUS-PD at 4 academic centers in 3 countries. Patient demographics, medical history, procedure data, and follow-up clinical data were collected. Technical success was defined as successful pancreatic duct drainage with stent placement. Clinical success was defined as resolution or improvement of symptoms or improvement on postprocedure imaging. Results: Eighty patients (62.5% men; mean age, 58.2 +/- 15.5 years) were included. All patients had attempted ERP and/or extracorporeal lithotripsy if needed before EUS-PD. Technical success was achieved in 89% of patients (n = 71). Clinical success was achieved in 81% of patients overall (65/80) and in 92% of patients who achieved technical success (65/71). Immediate adverse events occurred in 20% of patients (n = 16) and delayed adverse events occurred in 11% of patients (n = 9). Conclusions: With appropriate endoscopic expertise, EUS-PD offers a minimally invasive, more effective, and safer alternative to some surgical PD procedures. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01522573.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据