4.4 Review

Polymeric Nanoparticles for Nasal Drug Delivery to the Brain: Relevance to Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

ADVANCED THERAPEUTICS
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adtp.202000076

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; blood-brain barrier; chitosan; intranasal drug delivery; poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); polymeric nanoparticles

资金

  1. U.S. NIH [R01AI050875, R21AI121700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease is the leading cause of dementia cases, but the exact cause of the disease remains unknown. Drug delivery through the nasal pathway is seen as a promising method for treating AD. This review discusses the use of natural and polymeric nanoparticles for nasal drug delivery to the brain for AD treatment.
Currently, Alzheimer's disease (AD) accounts for more than half of all dementia cases. Although genetics, age, and environmental factors affect the disease, the cause of AD is not yet fully known. Various drugs have been proposed for the prevention and treatment of AD, but the delivery of these therapeutic agents to the brain is difficult. The blood-brain barrier prevents systemic drugs from accessing the central nervous system and designing a suitable system to overcome this barrier has attracted much attention. The intranasal pathway, given its proximity to the brain, provides a great opportunity for drug delivery. Understanding the physiological characteristics of the nose can be useful in selecting the appropriate carrier and material. Some of the emerging vehicles used for nose-to-brain delivery of anti-AD drugs are natural (such as chitosan) and polymeric (such as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) and polyethylene glycol) nanoparticles (NPs). This review discusses the hypotheses for AD pathogenesis and highlights recent advances in the applications of natural and polymeric NPs for treatment. The fundamental and applied aspects of this approach for nasal drug delivery to the brain are reviewed here with thoughts on what is needed for the field to mature also provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据