3.8 Article

Coagulation/flocculation process for textile mill effluent treatment: experimental and numerical perspectives

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19397038.2020.1842547

关键词

Real textile wastewater; chemical coagulants; colour removal; artificial neural networks

资金

  1. Nile University (NU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that FeCl3 had the best treatment effect on textile wastewater at pH 9. Through experiments, the optimal operating conditions were determined to be rapid mixing for 1 minute, slow mixing for 20 minutes, and settling for 30 minutes.
This study investigates the feasibility of applying coagulation/flocculation process for real textile wastewater treatment. Batch experiments were performed to detect the optimum performance of four different coagulants; Ferric Sulphate (Fe-2(SO4)(3)), Aluminium Chloride (AlCl3), Aluminium Sulphate (Al-2(SO4)(3)) and Ferric Chloride (FeCl3) at diverse ranges of pH (1-11) on the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids (TSS), colour, total nitrogen (TN) and turbidity from real textile wastewater. At pH 9, FeCl3 demonstrated the most effective removal for all studied contaminants. Experiments were conducted to assess the dosage and operating conditions to achieve optimum removal efficiency for all studied contaminants by using FeCl3. The obtained results demonstrated the higher ability of FeCl3 in textile wastewater treatment with optimum conditions; pH 9, 150 rpm in 1 min rapid mixing, 30 rpm in 20 min slow mixing and 30 min settling. Artificial neural network (ANN) model was applied to predict the removal efficiencies of the studied contaminants under different variables using FeCl3 coagulant. ANN model adequately predicted the studied parameters removal efficiencies with a coefficient of determination greater than 90% and has the capability of simulating the coagulation process and predicting removal percentages using the author's experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据