期刊
VISUAL COGNITION
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 1-21出版社
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949
关键词
Salience; attentional set; control; suppression; attention; visual search
资金
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council [833029]
- National Eye Institute [F32EY024834]
- National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH076226]
- European Research Council (ERC) [833029] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
Recent research suggests that salient stimuli can automatically produce a priority signal, but attentional capture can be prevented through an inhibitory mechanism. This has led researchers to reconsider their original views on attentional capture.
For over 25 years, researchers have debated whether physically salient stimuli capture attention in an automatic manner, independent of the observer's goals, or whether the capture of attention depends on the match between a stimulus and the observer's task set. Recent evidence suggests an intermediate position in which salient stimuli automatically produce a priority signal, but the capture of attention can be prevented via an inhibitory mechanism that suppresses the salient stimulus. Here, proponents from multiple sides of the debate describe how their original views have changed in light of recent research, as well as remaining areas of disagreement. These perspectives highlight some emerging areas of consensus and provide new directions for future research on attentional capture.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据