4.7 Article

New Genuinely Multipartite Entanglement

期刊

ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qute.202000123

关键词

entangled sources; genuinely multipartite nonlocality; permutationally symmetric states; quantum entanglement; quantum network

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772437,61702427]
  2. Sichuan Youth Science and Technique Foundation [2017JQ0048]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2682014CX095]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to address the issue of verifying single multipartite entanglement not generated by multisource quantum networks, by proposing a new local model and Bell inequality, demonstrating new genuinely multipartite entanglement in distributive scenarios.
The quantum entanglement as one of the important resources has been verified by using different local models. There is no efficient method to verify single multipartite entanglement that is not generated by multisource quantum networks with local operations and shared randomness. The goal in this work is to solve this problem. First, a new local model is proposed for describing all the states that can be generated by using distributed entangled states and shared randomness without classical communication. This model is stronger than the biseparable model and implies new genuinely multipartite entanglement. With the present local model it is proved that all the permutationally symmetric entangled pure states are new genuinely multipartite entanglement. It is further proved that the new feature holds for all the multipartite entangled pure states in the biseparable model with the dimensions of local systems being not larger than three. The new multipartite entanglement is also robust against general noises. Finally, a simple Bell inequality is provided to verify new genuinely multipartite entangled pure qubit states in the present model. The results show new insight into featuring the genuinely multipartite entanglement in the distributive scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据