4.6 Article

The Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapies for Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 379-386

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/jca.46847

关键词

locally advanced gastric cancer; neoadjuvant therapies; adjuvant chemotherapy; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; neoadjuvant chemoradiation

类别

资金

  1. Beijing Hope Run Special Fund of Cancer Foundation of China [LC2017L01]
  2. Special Research Projects for Capital Health Development [2014-1-2151]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0908300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study suggests that neoadjuvant therapies can improve survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer compared to surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, especially for those who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Neoadjuvant therapy can also increase the pathological complete response rate, improve disease-free survival, and local-recurrence-free survival rates.
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant therapies (NAT) on patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed LAGC patients treated at the China National Cancer Center between October 2006 and December 2018. All patients included were divided into two groups, NAT followed by surgery (NAT-Surgery) and adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery (Surgery-ACT). Subgroup analysis compared between patients underwent either neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) was conducted. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to reduce selection bias. Results: In total, 2779 patients were included in this study (494 of NAT-Surgery group and 2285 of Surgery-ACT group). After PSM, the patients in NAT-Surgery group had a significantly longer overall survival (OS) than patients in Surgery-ACT group (P<0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more frequently observed in nCRT group during neoadjuvant treatment (52.0% in nCRT group vs. 34.0% in nCT group, P=0.010). Pathological complete response (pCR) being achieved in 17.0% after nCRT versus 4.0% after nCT ( P<0.001). Patients of the nCRT group obtained better disease-free survival (DFS, P=0.024) and local-recurrence-free survival (LRFS, P=0.014) than patients in nCT group, while there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, NAT improved survival outcomes among LAGC patients over surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. In comparison with nCT, nCRT resulted in higher pCR rate, better DFS and LRFS, without significantly affecting OS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据