Changes in Circulating Stem and Progenitor Cell Numbers Following Acute Exercise in Healthy Human Subjects: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Despite of the increasing number of investigations on the effects of acute exercise on circulating stem and progenitor cell (SC) numbers, and in particular on respective subgroups, i.e. endothelial (ESC), hematopoietic (HSC), and mesenchymal (MSC) stem and progenitor cells, a consensus regarding mechanisms and extent of these effects is still missing. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the overall-effects of acute exercise on the different SC-subgroups and investigate possible subject- and intervention-dependent factors affecting the extent of SC-mobilization in healthy humans. Trials assessing SC numbers before and at least one timepoint after acute exercise, were identified in a systematic computerized search. Compared to baseline, numbers were significantly increased for early and non-specified SCs (enSCs) until up to 0.5 h after exercise (0-5 min: +0.64 [Standardized difference in means], p<0.001; 6-20 min: +0.42, p<0.001; 0.5 h: +0.29, p=0.049), for ESCs until 12-48 h after exercise (0-5 min: +0.66, p<0.001; 6-20 min: +0.43 p<0.001; 0.5 h: +0.43, p=0.002; 1 h: +0.58, p=0.001; 2 h: +0.50, p=0.002; 3-8 h: +0.70, p<0.001; 12-48 h: +0.38, p=0.003) and for HSCs at 0-5 min (+0.47, p<0.001) and at 3 h after exercise (+0.68, p<0.001). Sex, intensity and duration of the intervention had generally no influence. The extent and kinetics of the exercise-induced mobilization of SCs differ between SC-subpopulations. However, also definitions of SC-subpopulations are non-uniform. Therefore, finding a consensus with a clear definition of cell surface markers defining ESCs, HSCs and MSCs is a first prerequisite for understanding this important topic.

Automated summary

This meta-analysis found that the effects and kinetics of acute exercise on different subgroups of stem cells vary, with sex, intensity, and duration of intervention generally having little influence. Defining consensus on cell surface markers for defining ESCs, HSCs, and MSCs is crucial for understanding this important topic.