4.7 Article

First lattice calculation of radiative leptonic decay rates of pseudoscalar mesons

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014502

关键词

-

资金

  1. PRACE [Pra17-4394]
  2. CINECA under the specific initiative [INFN-LQCD123]
  3. MIUR (Italy)
  4. STFC (UK) [ST/P000711/1]
  5. Leverhulme Trust
  6. University of Rome
  7. Italian Ministry of Research (MIUR) [PRIN 20172LNEEZ]
  8. INFN [GRANT73/CALAT]
  9. STFC [ST/P000711/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents a nonperturbative lattice calculation method for accurately predicting the leptonic decay rates of pseudoscalar mesons, distinguishing contributions from different factors in the amplitude, and also focuses on the evaluation of leptonic decay rates with emission of a hard photon.
We present a nonperturbative lattice calculation of the form factors which contribute to the amplitudes for the radiative decays P -> l (v) over bar (l gamma), where P is a pseudoscalar meson and l is a charged lepton. Together with the nonperturbative determination of the corrections to the processes P -> l (v) over bar (l),= due to the exchange of a virtual photon, this allows accurate predictions at O(alpha(em)) to be made for leptonic decay rates for pseudoscalar mesons ranging from the pion to the D-s meson. We are able to separate unambiguously and nonpertubatively the pointlike contribution, from the structure-dependent, infrared-safe, terms in the amplitude. The fully nonperturbative O(alpha) improved calculation of the inclusive leptonic decay rates will lead to the determination of the corresponding Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elements also at O(alpha(em)). Prospects for a precise evaluation of leptonic decay rates with emission of a hard photon are also very interesting, especially for the decays of heavy D and B mesons for which currently only modeldependent predictions are available to compare with existing experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据