4.7 Article

Is quantitative and qualitative information relevant for choosing mutual funds?

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 476-488

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.015

关键词

Mutual funds; Performance; Persistence; Ratings; Morningstar

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that using ratings alone is not sufficient to effectively identify outperforming mutual funds. Choosing funds with positive Parent, Process, and Price can improve fund selection, and combining quantitative and qualitative information as well as their pillars can further enhance the screening of mutual funds.
Investors use ratings to make their investment decisions. In this paper we analyze whether the combination of qualitative and quantitative information allows the mutual funds to be identified that are able to beat their peers'. Our results show just a little evidence when we use ratings in isolation. The selection of mutual funds improves when we choose those with a positive Parent, Process and Price. Finally, the combination of Star (quantitative) and Analyst (qualitative) information as well as their pillars improves the screening of mutual funds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据