4.3 Article

WEAK SEQUENTIAL STABILITY FOR A NONLINEAR MODEL OF NEMATIC ELECTROLYTES

期刊

出版社

AMER INST MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES-AIMS
DOI: 10.3934/dcdss.2020366

关键词

Nernst-Planck equation; Navier-Stokes system; a-priori estimates; compactness; weak-sequential stability

资金

  1. GNAMPA (Gruppo Nazionale per l'Analisi Matematica, la Probabilita e le loro Applicazioni) of INdAM (Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica)
  2. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR): Dipartimenti di Eccellenza Program (2018-2022) - Dept. of Mathematics F. Casorati, University of Pavia
  3. Basque Government through the BERC 2018-2021 program
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness MINECO through BCAM Severo Ochoa excellence accreditation [SEV-2017-0718]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness MINECO - (AEI/FEDER, UE) [MTM2017-82184-R]
  6. DESFLU
  7. Czech Sciences Foundation (GACR) [18-05974S]
  8. [RVO:67985840]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article studies a system of nonlinear PDEs modeling the electrokinetics of a nematic electrolyte material consisting of various ion species in a nematic liquid crystal. It focuses on the two-species case and proves apriori estimates providing weak sequential stability, the main step towards proving the existence of weak solutions.
In this article we study a system of nonlinear PDEs modelling the electrokinetics of a nematic electrolyte material consisting of various ions species contained in a nematic liquid crystal. The evolution is described by a system coupling a Nernst-Planck system for the ions concentrations with a Maxwell's equation of electrostatics governing the evolution of the electrostatic potential, a Navier-Stokes equation for the velocity field, and a non-smooth Allen-Cahn type equation for the nematic director field. We focus on the two-species case and prove apriori estimates that provide a weak sequential stability result, the main step towards proving the existence of weak solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据