3.8 Article

Learning at home: What preschool children's parents do and what they want to learn from their children's teachers

期刊

JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 309-322

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1476718X20971321

关键词

early childhood education and care; literacy development; mathematics; parental viewpoints; parent involvement; home learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that parents prioritize reading over mathematics, lack of confidence may lead to differences in child engagement, and most parents want more information from their children's teachers.
This study investigated the beliefs parents of preschoolers (N = 126) have for facilitating their children's reading and mathematics development. The study used an online survey distributed via social media to examine parents' views of their children's home-based reading and mathematics engagement, parents' confidence to support their children's reading and mathematics development, and the information they received and would like to receive from their children's teachers. The results demonstrated three patterns: (1) parents prioritized children's reading over their mathematics development, (2) the difference in children's reported engagement in such activities may come from parents lacking confidence in how to foster their children's mathematics skills, and (3) almost two/thirds of the parents wanted to receive more information from their children's teachers, typically about children's progress and activities and apps to do with their children at home. Preschool teachers play an important role in supporting home learning of reading and mathematics. Preschool teachers and parents need to collaborate on home-based activities that support such learning. We have demonstrated that even highly educated parents may lack the confidence to support their young children's academic growth, particularly in mathematics, and so the support teachers provide to parents is critical.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据