4.8 Article

Genenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2021

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 D1, 页码 D939-D946

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa980

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [208349/Z/17/Z]
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health [U24HG003345]
  3. Wellcome Trust [208349/Z/17/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee assigns unique symbols and names to human genes, with over 42,000 approved gene symbols in their database. The Vertebrate Gene Nomenclature Committee assigns standardized nomenclature for vertebrate species, expanding to include species like cat, macaque, and pig.
The HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) based at EMBL's European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) assigns unique symbols and names to human genes. There are over 42,000 approved gene symbols in our current database of which over 19 000 are for protein-coding genes. While we still update placeholder and problematic symbols, we are working towards stabilizing symbols where possible; over 2000 symbols for disease associated genes are now marked as stable in our symbol reports. All of our data is available at the HGNC website https: //www.genenames.org. The Vertebrate Gene Nomenclature Committee (VGNC) was established to assign standardized nomenclature in line with human for vertebrate species lacking their own nomenclature committee. In addition to the previous VGNC core species of chimpanzee, cow, horse and dog, we now name genes in cat, macaque and pig. Gene groups have been added to VGNC and currently include two complex families: olfactory receptors (ORs) and cytochrome P450s (CYPs). In collaboration with specialists we have also named CYPs in species beyond our core set. All VGNC data is available at https://vertebrate.genenames.org/. This article provides an overview of our online data and resources, focusing on updates over the last two years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据