4.4 Article

Creative extraction: Black towns in white space

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0263775820968563

关键词

Racial contract; racial capitalism; underdevelopment; incorporation; municipalities; infrastructure

资金

  1. Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture at Columbia University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the unique struggles Black-founded towns face for self-determined development, attributing these struggles to the racial contract and racial capitalism. It highlights the environmental harms and racially predatory governance experienced by Black towns.
This article interrogates the anomalous case of Black-founded towns, so-called because of their relative absence from discourse on Black place, their unique struggles for self-determined development, and their externally ascribed narratives of absent or dysfunctional governance, frequently invoked to explain their lack of access to basic infrastructure. We propose illuminating some of these so-called anomalies through Charles Mills' racial contract, which we argue structures space at a deeper level than traditional legal arrangements and allows us to look relationally at Black towns in white space. We also rely on Cedric Robinson's racial capitalism to demonstrate how white space develops through extraction of value from places racialized as nonwhite. Through the case of Tamina, Texas, we argue that Black towns specifically, and Black places more generally, experience racially predatory governance and resource extraction, often by nearby white places, under the guise of following mundane rules of legal jurisdiction, standard economic planning, and development. To illustrate this, we focus on three overlapping mechanisms of creative extraction that reinforce white spatial, political, and economic power at the expense of Black places: theft, erosion, and exclusion. These mechanisms are tied to the environmental harms inflicted on Black towns, as some of the existential threats they face.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据