4.7 Article

Confucius Institute, Belt and Road Initiative, and Internationalization

期刊

INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 237-256

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.09.011

关键词

Cultural institute; Institutions; Cultural distance; Belt and Road Initiative; Confucius Institute; Cross-border mergers and acquisitions

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72073037, 71873041, 71603060, 71573058]
  2. Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education of China [16JZD018]
  3. Soft Science Research Program of Guangdong, China [2019A101002100]
  4. National Statistics Research Program of China [2019LY88]
  5. Guangdong Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project [GD19YYJ05, GD20SQ01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study finds that Confucius Institute plays a positive role in the internationalization of Chinese enterprises, especially in Belt-Road countries, and this effect is more significant after the initiation of the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013. The earlier a host country joins the Belt and Road Initiative, the stronger the impact of Confucius Institute on the internationalization of Chinese enterprises.
In this paper, we study the role of Confucius Institute in supporting internationalization of Chinese enterprises. Employing a panel dataset containing 66 Belt-Road countries and 75 non Belt-Road countries from 2006 to 2017, we find that Confucius Institute has had a positive effect on Chinese CMA in general and such an effect is stronger in Belt-Road countries, especially after the Belt and Road Initiative was launched in 2013. Our results suggest that the earlier the host country joins the Belt and Road Initiative, the stronger is the interactive effect of CI and Belt and Road Initiative. Moreover, we show that Confucius Classroom, a related program also positively affects the Chinese CMA in the context of Belt and Road Initiative. These findings are robust to controlling for the endogeneity of reverse causality and sample selection bias.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据