4.5 Article

Personality, aggression, sensation seeking, and hormonal responses to challenge in Russian alpinists and special operation forces

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110238

关键词

Hormones; Personality; Anthropometry; Aggression; Sensation seeking; Risk

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [17-29-02203, 20-09-00139]
  2. Leibniz ScienceCampus Primate Cognition
  3. German Research Foundation (international cooperation program)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals behavioral differences in high-risk men, with Russian alpinists and Special Forces members showing variations in personality, aggression, and sensation seeking, possibly influenced by profession-related individual differences.
Male risk-taking behavior is associated with personality traits and correlates with hormone titers, notably for testosterone (T) and cortisol (C). Yet, these influences may be stronger in some individuals due to context or profession in which risk-taking occurs. We examine this possibility by investigating relationships of personality, aggression, and sensation seeking with T and C together with anthropometric measures in high risk-taking men: Russian alpinists (n = 55) and members of the Russian Special Forces (n = 33). They provided saliva samples before and after viewing a similar to 5 min video of aggressive male encounters and completed surveys after this task. After viewing the video, T increased in alpinists but decreased in Special Forces, and C increased in Special Forces. Alpinists scored higher than Special Forces in neuroticism and openness whereas Special Forces scored higher than alpinists in extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Verbal aggression, anger, hostility, experience seeking, disinhibition, and boredom susceptibility were higher in alpinists than in Special Forces. Our findings suggest behavioral differences in high risk-taking men, influenced by profession-related individual differences in sensation seeking and hormonal response to challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据