4.3 Article

Cross-Scale Systemic Resilience: Implications for Organization Studies

期刊

BUSINESS & SOCIETY
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 95-124

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0007650319825870

关键词

adaptive cycle; cross-scale; natural science; resilience

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article emphasizes the importance of a cross-scale perspective in studying organizational resilience. It highlights the interdependence between organizational resilience and the resilience of broader social-ecological systems. Understanding feedback effects across nested systems is crucial for long-term organizational resilience management.
In this article, we posit that a cross-scale perspective is valuable for studies of organizational resilience. Existing research in our field primarily focuses on the resilience of organizations, that is, the factors that enhance or detract from an organization's viability in the face of threat. While this organization level focus makes important contributions to theory, organizational resilience is also intrinsically dependent upon the resilience of broader social-ecological systems in which the firm is embedded. Moreover, long-term organizational resilience cannot be well managed without an understanding of the feedback effects across nested systems. For instance, a narrow focus on optimizing organizational resilience from one firm's perspective may come at the expense of social-ecological functioning and ultimately undermine managers' efforts at long-term organizational survival. We suggest that insights from natural science may help organizational scholars to examine cross-scale resilience and conceptualize organizational actions within and across temporal and spatial dynamics. We develop propositions taking a complex adaptive systems perspective to identify issues related to focal scale, slow variables and feedback, and diversity and redundancy. We illustrate our theoretical argument using an example of Unilever and palm oil production in Borneo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据