3.8 Article

Givosiran, a novel treatment for acute hepatic porphyrias

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2021.1838275

关键词

Acute hepatic porphyria; acute intermittent porphyria; efficacy; givosiran; hemin; safety; side effect profile; siRNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute hepatic porphyrias are rare genetic disorders affecting the heme biosynthetic pathway enzymes, with severe abdominal pain as a cardinal feature. The novel siRNA therapeutic agent givosiran has shown efficacy in decreasing levels of key enzymes and neurotoxins, but may cause side effects. Insurances are likely to restrict access to expensive treatments for patients with well-documented AHP and frequent severe attacks.
Introduction: Acute hepatic porphyrias (AHPs) are a group of rare genetic disorders that affect the enzymes of the heme biosynthetic pathway. Patients have a varied presentation, but attacks of severe abdominal pain are the cardinal feature. Until recently, IV hemin was the only definitive treatment option available. Areas covered: We summarize salient features of AHP and the work leading to clinical studies of givosiran and to its approval by the US FDA and the EMA. Givosiran is a novel siRNA therapeutic agent that targets hepatic 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) synthase-1, the first and rate limiting enzyme in the heme biosynthetic pathway. It has been effective in decreasing the levels of hepatic ALA synthase-1 mRNA, levels of ALA, which likely is the chief neurotoxin, and the composite attack rates in patients with AHP. The drug can cause elevated liver enzymes, elevations in serum creatinine, and injection site reactions. Single doses, given to asymptomatic persons with AIP who are chronic high excretors of ALA and porphobilinogen, caused decreases in CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 activity, raising concern for drug interactions. Expert opinion: Givosiran is expensive; insurance plans are likely to limit its availability to patients with well-documented AHP and frequent and severe acute attacks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据