4.2 Article

Place-responsive Pedagogies in the Anthropocene: Attuning with the more-than-human

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 864-878

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2020.1867710

关键词

New materialism; more-than-human; place-responsive; outdoor learning; posthumanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article explores the application of place-responsive pedagogies in the context of the Anthropocene and environmental concerns through the lens of New Materialist frameworks. It emphasizes the role and importance of the more-than-human in education. Findings suggest that place-responsive pedagogies stem from reciprocal attunements among participants, with individual attention and response to environmental processes and features playing a critical role in teaching and learning.
Drawing on New Materialist frameworks for environmental and sustainability education, we extend and deepen our understanding of contemporary place-responsive pedagogies in the light of our human-impacted geological epoch, the Anthropocene, and its allied environmental concerns. Empirically, in a new and original way, we explore the role of the more-than-human in educators' planning and enactment of place-responsive pedagogies. We show that place-responsive pedagogies are derived from ongoing attunements reciprocally made by all participants to each other - educators, learners, and the more-than-human - and between the place of learning and these participants. Findings show that these attunements emerge from socio-environmental processes and features of a place, but this article also shows the critical importance of (i) what educators and learners are able to notice and respond to, (ii) how educators choose to build upon this noticing and response-making, and (iii) how they actively incorporate the agencies of the more-than-human into teaching and learning. Wider implications for researching environmental and sustainability education are considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据