4.2 Article

Infectious disease surveillance of apparently healthy horses at a multi-day show using a novel nanoscale real-time PCR panel

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1040638720972096

关键词

equine infectious diseases; equine surveillance; horses

资金

  1. NIH HHS [T32 OD011000] Funding Source: Medline
  2. FDA HHS [U18 FD006716, U18 FD005144] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the United States, horses are commonly used for various purposes, which highlights the importance of understanding and preventing disease transmission risks. Research findings indicate that healthy horses harbor a variety of pathogens, emphasizing the need for biosecurity measures to prevent disease spread.
In the United States, horses are used for a variety of purposes including recreation, exhibition, and racing. As farm, performance, and companion animals, horses are a unique species from a zoonotic disease risk perspective, and the risks of subclinical infections spreading among horses can pose challenges. Using a nanoscale real-time PCR platform, we investigated the prevalence of 14 enteric pathogens, 11 Escherichia coli genes, and 9 respiratory pathogens in fecal samples from 97 apparently healthy horses at a multi-day horse event. In addition, sugar flotation test was performed for fecal parasites. E. coli f17 was commonly detected, prevalent in 59% of horses, followed closely by Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus (55%). Additional pathogens recognized included betacoronavirus, Campylobacter jejuni, Cryptosporidium sp., E. coli O157, equine adenovirus 1, equine rhinitis B virus, and others. The use of PCR data may overestimate the true prevalence of these pathogens but provides a sensitive overview of common pathogens present in healthy horses. Our results prompt the continued need for practical biosecurity measures at horse shows, both to protect individuals interacting with these horses and to minimize transmission among horses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据