4.7 Article

In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles

期刊

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105842

关键词

Driving automation; Anticipatory driving; SAE levels; Driver behavior; Visual attention; Driving simulator

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2016-05580]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that providing surrounding traffic information in automated vehicles can help drivers anticipate traffic conflicts, take preventive measures, and improve driving safety.
Objective: This paper investigates the effectiveness of in-vehicle displays in supporting drivers' anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles (AVs). Background: Providing takeover requests (TORs) along with information on automation capability (AC) has been found effective in supporting AV drivers' reactions to traffic conflicts. However, it is unclear what type of information can support drivers in anticipating traffic conflicts, so they can intervene (pre-event action) or prepare to intervene (pre-event preparation) proactively to avert them. Method: In a driving simulator study with 24 experienced and 24 novice drivers, we evaluated the effectiveness of two in-vehicle displays in supporting anticipatory driving in AVs with adaptive cruise control and lane keeping assistance: TORAC (TOR + AC information) and STTORAC displays (surrounding traffic (ST) information + TOR + AC information). Both displays were evaluated against a baseline display that only showed whether the automation was engaged. Results: Compared to the baseline display, STTORAC led to more anticipatory driving behaviors (pre-event action or pre-event preparation) while TORAC led to less, along with decreased attention to environmental cues that indicated an upcoming event. STTORAC led to the highest level of driving safety, as indicated by minimum gap time for scenarios that required driver intervention, followed by TORAC, and then the baseline display. Conclusions: Providing surrounding traffic information to drivers of AVs, in addition to TORs and automation capability information, can support their anticipation of potential traffic conflicts. Without the surrounding traffic information, drivers can over-rely on displays that provide TORs and automation capability information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据