4.7 Article

Understanding cultural ecosystem services related to farmlands: Expert survey in Europe

期刊

LAND USE POLICY
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104900

关键词

Cultural ecosystem services; Social-ecological systems; Landscape planning and management; Inter- and transdisciplinary; Policy; Expert

资金

  1. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CCCDI-UEFISCDI [BiodivERsA-FACCE2014-47]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are nonmaterial benefits obtained from ecosystems, covering a wide range of domains. European agricultural landscapes are complex social-ecological systems where synergies and trade-offs between production and conservation determine CES values. Experts believe that interdisciplinary approaches and integrative science-policy methodologies are promising to improve CES approach for policy and management, but practical implementation in policies targeting agricultural landscapes still lags behind.
Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are nonmaterial benefits that people obtain from ecosystems. The CES subcategories cover a wide range of domains (e.g. recreation, conservation of cultural heritage, human-nature relations). The CES concept has been proposed to acknowledge the nonmaterial values linking people and nature in social-ecological systems. Agricultural landscapes are outstanding examples of complex social-ecological systems where synergies and trade-offs between production and conservation determine the CES values. Europe is still rich in such landscapes/systems with outstanding cultural and natural values that deliver a multitude of CES. In this paper, we address the knowledge and perceptions of identified experts on the role of CES in the management of European agricultural landscapes. To achieve this goal, we developed a questionnaire on CES which was answered by experts working with various issues of European agricultural landscapes, including sustainable agriculture, landscape ecology, grassland management, nature conservation, cultural heritage conservation, environmental policy, sustainability research and rural development. The results show a wide knowledge and acceptance of the CES concept within such expert communities. Especially the aesthetic, cultural heritage, educational and recreational values were considered the most relevant CES subcategories. Interdisciplinary approaches, landscape planning and integrative science-policy approaches were perceived as the most promising methodologies to improve the CES approach for policy and management. Our results also show that according to experts the CES concept is still far from practical implementation in policies that target agricultural landscapes. In order to sustain such systems, we suggest the better implementation of inter- and transdisciplinary research for the development of CES-integrative policy and decision-making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据