4.6 Article

Identification of key cyberbullies: A text mining and social network analysis approach

期刊

TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101504

关键词

Cyberbullying; Cyberbully; Losada ratio; Cyberbullying index; Text mining; Social network analysis; Centrality

资金

  1. Yonsei University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our study focuses on blocking malicious comments by identifying key offenders through text mining and social network analysis. By applying these methods, we are able to analyze the influence of core users who make high rates of insulting comments in online communities. This proposed method has the potential to manage online communities and reduce cyberbullying.
Cyberbullying is a major problem in society, and the damage it causes is becoming increasingly significant. Previous studies on cyberbullying focused on detecting and classifying malicious comments. However, our study focuses on a substantive alternative to block malicious comments via identifying key offenders through the application of methods of text mining and social network analysis (SNA). Thus, we propose a practical method of identifying social network users who make high rates of insulting comments and analyzing their resultant influence on the community. We select the Korean online community of Daum Agora to validate our proposed method. We collect over 650,000 posts and comments via web crawling. By applying a text mining method, we calculate the Losada ratio, a ratio of positive-to-negative comments. We then propose a cyberbullying index and calculate it based on text mining. By applying the SNA method, we analyze relationships among users so as to ascertain the influence that the core users have on the community. We validate the proposed method of identifying key cyberbullies through a real-world application and evaluations. The proposed method has implications for managing online communities and reducing cyberbullying.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据