4.6 Article

Collaboration between a Pt-dimer and neighboring Co-Pd atoms triggers efficient pathways for oxygen reduction reaction

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 1822-1834

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp05205a

关键词

-

资金

  1. City University of Hong Kong [9610336]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST106-2112-M-007-001-MY3, MOST 109-2112-M-007-030-MY3, MOST109-3116-F-007-001-]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposed a novel diatomic Pt-cluster model to simulate the surface of nanocatalysts, and systematically investigated its collaboration pathways in the oxygen reduction reaction through density functional theory. The results demonstrate that this model exhibits the best-performing behavior in ORR.
The development of electrocatalysts with reconcilable balance between the cost and performance in oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is an imperative task for the widespread adoption of fuel cell technology. In this study, we proposed a unique model of diatomic Pt-cluster (Pt-dimer) in the topmost layer of the Co/Pd bimetallic slab (Co@Pd-Pt-2) for mimicking the Co-core@Pd-shell nanocatalysts (NCs) surface and systematically investigating its local-regional collaboration pathways in ORR by density functional theory (DFT). The results demonstrate that the Pt-dimer produces local differentiation from both ligand and geometric effects on the Co@Pd surface, which forms adsorption energy (E-ads) gradients for relocating the ORR-adsorbates. Our calculations for E-ads-variations of ORR-species, reaction coordinates, and intraparticle charge injection propose and confirm a novel local synergetic collaboration around the Pt-dimer in the Co@Pd-Pt-2 system with the best-performing ORR behavior compared with all reference models. With proper selection of the composition in intraparticle components, the proposed DFT assessments could be adopted for developing economical and high-performance catalysts in various heterogeneous reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据