4.1 Article

Investigating mechanisms for recruiting and retaining volunteers: The role of habit strength and planning in volunteering engagement

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 161, 期 3, 页码 363-378

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2020.1845113

关键词

Volunteering; temporal self-regulation theory; intention; habit strength; planning

资金

  1. HACC (Home and Community Care) Growth funding in 2016/17 (HACC NonRecurrent Funding), Department of Health, Government of Western Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that volunteering rates are declining in high-income countries, and it explores the impact of conscious and non-conscious factors on volunteering engagement. Findings indicate that both intention and habit strength are significant predictors of volunteering engagement, and strategies for recruiting and retaining volunteers should consider both rational and automatic processes.
Volunteering rates in high-income countries are declining. Most research into understanding volunteering engagement has focused on conscious processes (e.g., motives), with little exploration of non-conscious antecedents of volunteering engagement. Adopting a new line of investigation, this research used temporal self-regulation theory to investigate the influence of both rational and automatic processes on volunteering engagement. Two related studies using different methodologies were conducted to investigate the influence of intention, planning, and habit strength on volunteering engagement. In both studies, intention and habit strength were significant predictors of volunteering engagement, with planning only significantly predicting volunteering engagement in Study 1. It was also found, in Study 2, that habit strength moderated the intention-behavior relationship. These findings highlight that both rational and automatic processes play a part in volunteering engagement and have implications for recruiting and retaining volunteers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据