4.7 Article

Oscillations and random walk of the soliton core in a fuzzy dark matter halo

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 103, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.023508

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [CITA 490888-16]
  2. Simons Fellowship
  3. Department of Energy [DESC0011941]
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE1644869]
  5. Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
  6. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Colleges and Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been found that a fuzzy dark matter halo consists of a soliton core and a density profile, with the soliton core showing temporal oscillations and random walk excursions that can be explained by wave interference. Analysis of numerical simulations reveals that these phenomena are mainly due to a suitable superposition of the ground state and excited states. This eigenmode analysis sheds light on the evolution of a satellite halo undergoing tidal disruption.
A fuzzy dark matter halo consists of a soliton core close to the center and a Navarro-Frenk-White-like density profile in the outer region. Previous investigations found that the soliton core exhibits temporal oscillations and random walk excursions around the halo center. Analyzing a set of numerical simulations, we show that both phenomena can be understood as the results of wave interference-a suitable superposition of the ground (solitonic) state and excited states in a fixed potential suffices to account for the main features of these phenomena. Such an eigenmode analysis can shed light on the evolution of a satellite halo undergoing tidal disruption. As the outer halo is stripped away, reducing the amplitudes of the excited states, the ground state evolves adiabatically. This suggests diminished soliton oscillations and random walk excursions, an effect to consider in deducing constraints from stellar heating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据