4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Restorative experiences and online tourists' willingness to pay a price premium in an augmented reality environment

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102256

关键词

Augmented reality; Online immersion; Willingness to pay more; Pre-purchase decision making; Tourism products; Restorative experience

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan
  2. MOST [108-2410-H-155 -034 -MY2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the impact of empowerment features in augmented reality on online tourists, finding that these features trigger a restorative experience which enhances immersion and willingness to pay a premium price.
This study examined the effects of the restorative experience triggered by empowerment features in augmented reality (AR) on online tourists' immersion and willingness to pay a price premium in the pre-purchase phase. The study focused in particular on the coherence and compatibility perspectives of the restorative experience. A scenario survey was conducted to validate the research framework. The research findings clarified the psychological mechanism behind the willingness to pay a price premium in AR-empowered online travel experiences. They indicated that the two AR empowerment features namely environmental embedding and simulated physical control generate restorative experience, which further fostered immersion and ultimately resulted in the willingness to pay more. The results may help online tourism services select appropriate AR empowerment features that will incite tourists to pay a premium price and also help create an effective AR tourism destination experience in the pre-purchase phase. This study focused on the attention restoration theory, empowerment paradigms, and AR-based service technology to develop an integrated conceptual framework of the relationship among AR empowerment features, restorative experience, immersion, and pre-purchase decision-making behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据